Epstein Secrets

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

92), but lbJecause the DOJ is an agency specializing in law enforcement, its claim of a law enforcement purpose is entitled to deference," Ctr. for Nat'l Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dep't of Justice,331 F.3d 918, 926 Exemption 7(A) also protects records that, if released, could interfere with post-trial criminal

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

92), but lbJecause the DOJ is an agency specializing in law enforcement, its claim of a law enforcement purpose is entitled to deference," Ctr. for Nat'l Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dep't of Justice,331 F.3d 918, 926 Exemption 7(A) also protects records that, if released, could interfere with post-trial criminal

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

92), but lbJecause the DOJ is an agency specializing in law enforcement, its claim of a law enforcement purpose is entitled to deference," Ctr. for Nat'l Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dep't of Justice,331 F.3d 918, 926 Exemption 7(A) also protects records that, if released, could interfere with post-trial criminal