Epstein Secrets

ED. Attalnn,c or IV an. la 111Ched County Where Action Amex 3MI.MI.DADE 3 MONROE 3 BM/MARV ,'PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE It ANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION Mate .. - X- 'cum Bon Oath S Lei emseent PEatatiff U.S. Go.aament C efei der 3 3 ( Metal 0weseiaa 11.1.S

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

ND INVOLVED. K.5 CtnyS IIICheck County Where Action Arose MIAMI-DADS 3 MONROE 3 EIROW MID /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111 SN1DS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION derma -a- Leon Ben usio S (yeomen,. Ploite0 3 3 seders, Ones**, IVES. Doserninent Soo • Pany) , S. L

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

S Of Keene „ / / hian/n A n -t• C C. I,- /la 4-74 g aflyS es4te 3 MONROE 3 BROW AR D /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111. SUDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION taw/ sa• x - taw, &wow S Co• <motet 3 3 sedmlOses0.19 Mama IV.S. (immense Val Pony) U. S. 4 o .ernme

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

S Of Keene „ / / hian/n A n -t• C C. I,- /la 4-74 g aflyS es4te 3 MONROE 3 BROW AR D /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111. SUDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION taw/ sa• x - taw, &wow S Co• <motet 3 3 sedmlOses0.19 Mama IV.S. (immense Val Pony) U. S. 4 o .ernme

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

S Of Keene „ / / hian/n A n -t• C C. I,- /la 4-74 g aflyS es4te 3 MONROE 3 BROW AR D /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111. SUDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION taw/ sa• x - taw, &wow S Co• <motet 3 3 sedmlOses0.19 Mama IV.S. (immense Val Pony) U. S. 4 o .ernme

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

ider efissoOirtes y taco ( ii Cheek County Where Action Arose 7 MIAMI. DADE 7 MONROE 7 OROWARD /PALM BEACH 7 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 7 OKEECHOBEE HIGHLANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION alba so •X' as Wee Mt 0401 III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES:ria...-x- a ox. Mx lee Planar DEFENDANTS /

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

ONDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION Of Tilt TR PCT L AND INS OEM Ann /Ks a tryf All0111Cy5 DI Kt,. nl 3 /AARON 3 ST. LUC. IC 3 INDIAN RIVER 7 OKEECHOBEE HIGHLANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION 'Plan a'," mow oat onto ti I timertamm 1 I 1irditslOriessia• Pieria ills. ***** mem No • Fano U S. 4.

VRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States'. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States.. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its

E: IN LAND ( ONDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION OF THE TR %CT LAND INVOLVED. k. arrYs Ace e PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 7 OKEECHOBEE 1110111. ANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION iPlace aa "X' ita Ore Don Oaly) S (comment 3 3 Feelml0maios Pl4eatiff 1U.S.Cicnetommea Nu. • Piny) 1

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

TR ACT LAND IIIVOL VIE. /ee a reyS check COMIly Mkt AEISIXIMaNt 3 MIAMI. DADS 3 MONROE 3 MOW' PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1414111LAHDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION nun Joon en own 7 1 1,74.4.04ettame 3 3 NNW.: 43.0014. 1710.011 03.6. 00,40..... Hos • Posy) 134.4.14

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at '3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (ED.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its