Epstein Secrets

From: "Nelson, Michael" < Date: October 25, 2016 at 1:33:00 AM EDT To: Darren Indyke Cc: La , Rob DiCastri < "Claire Brugirard" , Ashok Kumar , Husham Osman Subject: RE: BBJ SN 30884 ICC-MERO.FID1500434I Dear Darren, Further to my email below, please let us know if you have any comments or queries in r

ection 2(a)(xi): The determination by the DAR of the aircraft being able to obtain a US certificate of airworthiness is still under consideration by Royal Jet. Notwithstanding the US$500,000 threshold on rectifications, Royal Jet is not keen to proceed where the extent of those rectifications will be subje

l us anytime for questions. Looking forward to moving forward with this an= all the best. </=> Best Regards, =span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"> Husham Osman Director Technical EFTA_R1_01556144 EFTA02454418 please note The information contained in this=communication is confidential, may be attorney

you wanted us =o note during the discussion today: - Intermix of Engines resulting in di=ferent hours is due to the engine stagger program of Royal Jet fleet. Howe=er both engines are far away from overhaul as the first removal LLP is at =0,200cycles while Engl@2,000cyc and Eng2@3,000 approx. so yo

06.jpg> From: Nelson, Michael Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 10:42 PM To: Darren Indyke Cc: Larry; Rob DiCastri; Claire Brugirard; Ashok Kumar; Husham Osman Subject: RE: BBJ SN 30884 (CC-MERO.FID15004341 Dear Darren, Thank you for your email below. Please find attached a revised draft of the Aircraft

ection 2(a)(xi): The determination by the DAR of the aircraft being able to obtain a US certificate of airworthiness is still under consideration by Royal Jet. Notwithstanding the US$500,000 threshold on rectifications, Royal Jet is not keen to proceed where the extent of those rectifications will be subje