Epstein Secrets

nting for the influence of legal knowledge, cultural stereotypes. personal efficacy, and prosecutor contact. Nolence Against Women. 2.25-62. Koss. M. P. (1992). The underdetection of rape: Methodological chokes influence incidence estimates. Journal of Social Issues. 48.61-75. Koss, M. P.. & Harvey.

"second assault": Legal organizations' framing of rape victims. Law and Social/nip:try. 19, 853-890. Muchlenhard. C. L.. Friedman• D. E.. & Thomas. C. M. (1985). Is date rape justifiable? Psy- chology of Women Quarterly. 9.297-309. Myers. M. A.. @ LaFree, G. D. (1982). Sexual assault and its prosecuti

M. (2004). Disclosing unwanted sexual experiences: Results from a national sample of adolescent women. Child Abuse and Neglect. 28. 147-165. Koss. M. P. (1988). Criminal ViCithlIZIIii011 among mitten: Impact on health status and medical service wage (Grant No. 85-H-CX• 0038). Washington. DC: Nationa

in children: A preliminary validation of the children's responses to trauma inventory. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma. 3(3). 192-204. Arata. C. M. (1998). To tell or not to tell: Current functioning of child sexual abuse survivors who disclosed their victimization. Child Mahreannent. 3(I). 63-

M. (2004). Disclosing unwanted sexual experiences: Results from a national sample of adolescent women. Child Abuse and Neglect. 28. 147 165. Koss, M. P. (1988). Criminal victimization among women: Impact on health status and medical service usage (Grant No. 85 13 CX 0038). Washington. DC: National I

in children: A preliminary validation of the children's responses to trauma inventory. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 3(3), 192 204. Arata, C. M. (1998). To tell or not to tell: Current functioning of child sexual abuse survivors who disclosed their victimization. Child Maltreatment, 3(1), 63