Epstein Secrets

. 2422(b); 2252(a)(1) Not Consummated Sting 59 EFTA01729543 COST. ' :cASES, _ ' • ACtLJTY : FACTS/071WAPSIOthiON • C 9 , .. U.S. v. Rader, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12791 (1 Ph Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet conversations with undercover agent; sent videos of adults having se

duction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(6) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 43 EFTA01729527 44 EFTA01729528 COURT . - ,-. r. ' , • •lc .f5 , , d • ',

ggitii i-' m:4 4aN.,-2 ,: # 'W fi 0 e IS. ,, .. '131b6; .,... .,j. 4Stalit . SeAa( ;17 : -: 1 :rW . :741f . VittilbtfrSlic: "M U.S. v. Rader, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12791 (11th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet conversations with undercover agent; sent videos of adults having se

uction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 43 EFTA00079456 COURT . ' C ES : i F - .• : FACTS COMMUNIC TION - ., U.S.

2422(6); 2423(b) Consummated 62 EFTA00226334 COURT 1 "-r..i a y --' - • • — FACZITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION •-.. . .. CHARGE . . U.S. v. Rader, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12'791 (11th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet conversations with undercover agent; sent videos of adults having s

uction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 47 EFTA00226349 COURT CASES' FACILITY -.. .FACTS/COa1UNICKITON CHARGE •; U.S. I