Epstein Secrets

ion (including, for example, e- mails) that red to, or sent by Reinhart in which the word "Epstein," " "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh,' r afana, " "Florida SS Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian,"' "Sanchez," "358 El Brillo Way" appears and which

eness of the Government's witness, subject, or tar et o Ghislaine Maxwell, ▪ Investigation Includi Larry Mo iso i 1 ogers, r lam Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (including telephone logs and telephone billing statements) mad

ccess to information against any public interest in non-disclosure. That balancing process is ordinarily made with reference to factors discussed in Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339, 344 (E.D.Pa.1973), specifically: (1) the extent to which disclosure will thwart governmental processes by discouraging ci

t et of the E stein invests ation includin Ghislaine Maxwell, , Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visold, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made

ample, e- mails) that were sent to, copied to, or sent by in which the word "Epstein," "Kllen "Ruboyo," "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," S, " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez," "358 El Brillo Way" appears and

ccess to information against any public interest in non-disclosure. That balancing process is ordinarily made with reference to factors discussed in Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339, 344 (E.D.Pa.1973), specifically: (1) the extent to which disclosure will thwart governmental processes by discouraging ci

overnment's n witness, subject, or tar et of the Epstein i including )111%1;6 Maxwell, Larry Morrison, iso , David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made

uding, for example, e- mails) that were sent to copied to, or sent by in which the word "Epstein," ' " "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr... " "Black" "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez," appears and which are connected t

ccess to information against any public interest in non-disclosure. That balancing process is ordinarily made with reference to factors discussed in Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339, 344 (E.D.Pa.1973), specifically: (1) the extent to which disclosure will thwart governmental processes by discouraging ci

itness, subject, or t ' investigation, includin Ghislaine Maxwell, Lesley Groff, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (including telephone logs and telephone billing statements) mad

example, e- mails) that were sent to. conied to, or sent by Reinhart in which the word "Epstein," _ ' "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," "Villafana, " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez," "358 El Brillo Way" appe

ccess to information against any public interest in non-disclosure. That balancing process is ordinarily made with reference to factors discussed in Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339, 344 (E.D.Pa.1973), specifically: (1) the extent to which disclosure will thwart governmental processes by discouraging ci