Epstein Secrets

401 and P20. The Office will not =rovide your client with its investigative file. We look forward =o Dr. Krauss's continuing cooperation. Regards, Cynthia L. Jewett Senior Associate General Counsel Arizona State Universit tel mailt From: Lawrenc= Krauss [mailto Sent: Friday,=February 23, 2018 4:19 PM To: N

perceived acts of sexual harassment as public policy dictated =hat employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited =pprovingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 =L 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were =ases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In =ddition to its oblig

401 and P20. The Office will not =rovide your client with its investigative file. We look forward =o Dr. Krauss's continuing cooperation. Regards, Cynthia L. Jewett Senior Associate General Counsel Arizona Universit From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto mailt Sent: Friday,=February 23, 2018 4:19 PM aimah =aadiq C

perceived acts of sexual harassment as public policy dictated that employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 20=9 WL 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros an= Miller we=e cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. =n addition to its oblig

nd P20. Th= Office will not provide your client with its investigative file. We=look forward to Dr. Krauss's continuing cooperation. Regards= <=> Cynthia L. Jewett Senior Associate General Counsel<=u> Arizona State Univer=ity From:. Lawrence Krauss [mailto mailto Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:19 PM To:

perceived acts of sexual harassment as pub=ic policy dictated that employees must be protected from workplace sexual =arassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D= Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning discrimi=ation and harassment under Title VII. In addition to its oblig

401 and P20. The Office will not =rovide your client with its investigative file. We look forward =o Dr. Krauss's continuing cooperation. Regards, Cynthia L. Jewett Senior Associate General Counsel Arizona State UK <t <mailto From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto <mailto <mailto <mailto <mailto: > Sent: Friday

perceived acts of sexual harassment as public policy dictated that employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL =50225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. =n addition to its oblig