Epstein Secrets

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The -Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

NE slIt' Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Commication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21 United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electroni

was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA 's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

strict of Florida 99 NE 4th Street ' Miami, Florida 33132 Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does In and #2 v. United States, Case No.: 08.80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electroni

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at 1¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was) an orchestrated decision (between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein) to d

. Ste. 400 W. Palm Beach, Fl. 33401 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #2I United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein Dear Rolando: I write in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States At