Epstein Secrets

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

the unsealed filings, let me know. EFTA00206894 Re: Jane Does N I and N2'. United States Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM November 2, 2010 Page -3- Privileged Communication Included in this preservation order arc all Documents and data, including electronically stored information ("Esn, relating to the claims. The Vict

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The -Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

gment that you hay e received, read, EFTA00206921 Re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM November 2, 2010 Page -4- Privileged Communication and agree to comply with the preservation instructions contained in this letter. Please also complete, date and shot the attached form (Note — for

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

the unsealed filings, let me know. EFTA00206938 Re: Jane Does N I and N2'. United States Case No.: 9:08-ev-80736-KAM November 2, 2010 Page -3- Privileged Communication Included in this preservation order arc all Documents and data, including electronically stored information ("Esn, relating to the claims. The Vict

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at 1¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was) an orchestrated decision (between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein) to d

EFTA00189808 AUSA Deputy Chief Criminal ivision Re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM November 4, 2010 Page -3- Privileged Communication appears from AUSA Declaration that during the summer of 2007, negotiations between Epstein and the USAO-SDFLA commenced that led to the September