Epstein Secrets

rder, the proceedings should be stayed pending the adjudication of the first-filed action. (sac) (Entered: 10/16/2002) 10/09/2002 12 AFFIDAVIT of Marshall H. Fishman by Citibank, N.A. in opposition to [7-1] motion for an order, purl. to Rules 1, 12 and 13(a) of the FRCP, dismissing the Complaint, [7-2] motion fo

naged by MG. (Compl. 1112, 24; Epstein Decl. 118-10; Davison Aft 11 1, 102-18.) According to the plaintiffs, during the negotiations of this deal Davison represented to Epstein that he was "virtually assured of receiving an 18-20% return on [his] investment, with a possible return of as much as 80%"

O F. MORALES Clerk of the Court By: /s/ Deputy Clerk Copies to: Hon. Geoffrey W. Barnard Gregory H. Hodges, Esq. Maria Tankenson Hodge, Esq. Marshall H. Fishman, Esq. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 919 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022 Edward S. Feig, Esq. Arent, Fox, Klintner, Plotkin & Kahan, PLLC

plaintiffs seek rescission of the promissory note and punitive damages (Counts VI and VII). (Am. Compl. III 45-68.) In April 1999, Dayle Davison ["Davison"], Vice President of Citibank in New York and Epstein's private banker, and other Citibank employees telephoned Epstein while he was in the Virgin

O F. MORALES Clerk of the Court By: /s/ Deputy Clerk Copies to: Hon. Geoffrey W. Barnard Gregory H. Hodges, Esq. Maria Tankenson Hodge, Esq. Marshall H. Fishman, Esq. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 919 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022 Edward S. Feig, Esq. Arent, Fox, Klintner, Plotkin & Kahan, PLLC

o introduce him to an "exceptional investment opportunity." (Compl. 9f 13.) In follow-up telephone conversations during that same two week period, Davison and her associates made additional specific representations about the AIG Investment, without disclosing Citibank and AIG's relationship. Davison a