Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
EFTA00723248 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 242 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 14 of 22 unreasonable or otherwise unduly burdensome."); Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary's Donuts, Inc., 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001)("the burden of showing that the requested information is not relevant to the issues
1545, 1547 (11th Cir. 1985)(the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "strongly favor full discovery whenever possible"); Canal Authority v. Froehlke, 81 F.R.D. 609, 611 (M.D. Fla. 1979). Thus, under Rule 26, relevancy is "construed broadly to encompass any matter that bears on, or that reasonably could lead t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
FTA00728606 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 242 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 14 of 22 unreasonable or otherwise unduly burdensome."); Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary's Donuts, Inc., 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001)("the burden of showing that the requested information is not relevant to the issues
1545, 1547 (11th Cir. 1985)(the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "strongly favor full discovery whenever possible"); Canal Authority v. Froehlke, 81 F.R.D. 609, 611 (M.D. Fla. 1979). Thus, under Rule 26, relevancy is "construed broadly to encompass any matter that bears on, or that reasonably could lead t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rty resisting discovery to demonstrate specifically how the objected-to information is unnecessary, unreasonable or otherwise unduly burdensome."); Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary's Donuts, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25205, 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001)("the burden of showing that the requested information
545, 1547 (11th Cir. 1985)(the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "strongly favor full discovery whenever possible"); Canal Authority v. Froehlke, 81 F.R.D. 609, 611 (M.D. Fla. 1979). Thus, under Rule 26, relevancy is "construed broadly to encompass any matter that bears on, or that reasonably could lead to
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rty resisting discovery to demonstrate specifically how the objected-to information is unnecessary, unreasonable or otherwise unduly burdensome."); Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary's Donuts, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25205, 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001)("the burden of showing that the requested information
545, 1547 (11th Cir. 1985)(the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "strongly favor full discovery whenever possible"); Canal Authority v. Froehlke, 81 F.R.D. 609, 611 (M.D. Fla. 1979). Thus, under Rule 26, relevancy is "construed broadly to encompass any matter that bears on, or that reasonably could lead to
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (48)
Entities connected to both Dunkin Donuts and F.R.D. 609
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON22 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Bernie Sanders
PERSON6 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Donuts, Inc.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON5 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Georgia-Pacific Corp.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Dunbar
PERSON4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
FP
Farnsworth v. Proctor
PERSON4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
F.R.D. 519
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Panola Land Buyers
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
HI
Hickman
PERSON4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
RO
Rossbach
PERSON4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
CO
Coker
PERSON4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
J. Robert Oppenheimer
PERSON4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Oppenheimer Fund, Inc.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Canal Authority
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Duke & Co.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
Gamble Co.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Dunkin·4 w/ F.R.D.
the Federal Southern District
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Dunkin·2 w/ F.R.D.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON3 w/ Dunkin·2 w/ F.R.D.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON3 w/ Dunkin·2 w/ F.R.D.