Epstein Secrets

furthering the Ponzi scheme. 42. Any such actions by ROTHSTEIN, BODEN, BARNETT and VILLEGAS and the Litigation Team would be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflict of issues rules. 43. As a result of the fraudulent investment or

ividually, (also a named Defendant herein). (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business Div.), (hereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and attached hereto as Exhibit 1). 46. Plaintiff references the RRA dissolution action for the sole purpos

pose of furthering the Ponzi scheme. 52. Any such actions by ROTHSTEIN, others and the Litigation Team would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules. 53. As a result of the fraudulent investment or

ividually, (also a named Defendant herein). (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business Div.), (hereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and attached hereto as Exhibit 1). 27. Plaintiff references the RRA dissolution action for the sole purpos

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00190037 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business Div.), (hereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and attached hereto as Exhibit 2). 13. Plaintiff references the RRA dissolution action for the sole purpos

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00596500 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business Div.), (hereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and attached hereto as Exhibit 2). 13. Plaintiff references the RRA dissolution action for the sole purpos

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00729415 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business Div.), (hereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and attached hereto as Exhibit 2). 13. Plaintiff references the RRA dissolution action for the sole purpos

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00795599 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

nd RRA, agai T s TEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 s 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Sevent nth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, 'I‘ Florida, Complex Business Div.) 'nler "RRA dissolution action, and attached 4 k hereto as Exhibit 2). 13. Plaintiff references e PRA dissolution action for the sole purpose t

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00286294 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business Div.), (hereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and attached hereto as Exhibit 2). 13. Plaintiff references the RRA dissolution action for the sole purpos

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00193785 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 14 transportation on flights of RRA clients on any of EPSTEIN'S planes. But EDWARDS asked many inflamm

, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 059301, In the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, Complex Business Div.), (hereinafter "RRA dissolution action, and attached hereto as Exhibit 2). 13. Plaintiff references the RRA dissolution action for the sole purpos