Epstein Secrets

hich might possibly lead to evidence supporting some subsequent cause of action is quashed. COBB and PETERSON, IL, concur. Fla.App. 5 Dist.,2001. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 2 http://web2.westlaw.corn/print/printstream.aspx?sv

fore the court; judge expan- ded parameters of permitted discovery to a fishing expedition which "might give rise to a potential cause of action." West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). '706 Sharon Lee Stedman, of Sharon Lee Stedman, PA., Orlando, and Jack E. Carstensen of Rigdon, Alexander & Rigdon,

hich might possibly lead to evidence supporting some subsequent cause of action is quashed. COBB and PETERSON, IL, concur. Fla.App. 5 Dist.,2001. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.corn/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Split&p

efore the court; judge expan- ded parameters of permitted discovery to a fishing expedition which "might give rise to a potential cause of action." West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). '706 Sharon Lee Stedman, of Sharon Lee Stedman, PA., Orlando, and Jack E. Carstensen of Rigdon, Alexander & Rigdon,

the trial court incorrectly enforced the Proposal for Settlement because the proposal was ambiguous under the Florida Supreme Court's decision in State Farm Mut. Auto., Ins. Co. v. Nichols, 932 So.2d 1067 (Fla.2006). We are mindful of the requirements which must be satisfied for a proposal for settlement t

fter prevailing on summary judgment; settlement proposal was limited to claims against hospital and did not limit recovery against third parties. West's F.S.A. § 768.79; West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.442. Cases that cite this headnote Attorneys and Law Firms *815 John W. Kearns, Coral Gables, for appel