Epstein Secrets

ts have held that cases interpreting the Federal Rico Statute, title 18, U.S.C., are persuasive as to the meaning of Florida's Rico statute. . . "); Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729113 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 2

nd Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (3"1 Cir. 2007Xunderlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery under RICO). Moreover, despite Plaintiff's reaching arguments, she fails to cite any supporting case law or legislative a

ts have held that cases interpreting the Federal Rico Statute, title 18, U.S.C., are persuasive as to the meaning of Florida's Rico statute. . . "); Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729108 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 2

nd Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (3"1 Cir. 2007Xunderlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery under RICO). Moreover, despite Plaintiff's reaching arguments, she fails to cite any supporting case law or legislative a

, citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personnel injuries). 14. at 348. In Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 (M.D. Fla. 2001), the court held that claims for money damages relating to nursing home patients' deaths following massi

o Maanum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (and Cir. 2007)(underlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery under RICO). Finally, even Florida's Fourth DCA confirms that in order to have a claim for RICO, there must be damage to