Epstein Secrets

ts have held that cases interpreting the Federal Rico Statute, title 18, U.S.C., are persuasive as to the meaning of Florida's Rico statute. . . "); Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729113 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 2

laintiffs inartful arguments in her opposition motion addressing Section IV.(a) of Epstein's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. IL Plaintiff Lacks Standing To Bring The FCRCP Claim, Count IV, As She Seeks To Recover Personal Injury Damages Significantly, Fla. Stat. Chapter 772., the Florida Civil Remedies Crimi

ts have held that cases interpreting the Federal Rico Statute, title 18, U.S.C., are persuasive as to the meaning of Florida's Rico statute. . . "); Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729108 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 2

laintiffs inartful arguments in her opposition motion addressing Section IV.(a) of Epstein's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. IL Plaintiff Lacks Standing To Bring The FCRCP Claim, Count IV, As She Seeks To Recover Personal Injury Damages Significantly, Fla. Stat. Chapter 772., the Florida Civil Remedies Crimi

, citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personnel injuries). 14. at 348. In Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 (M.D. Fla. 2001), the court held that claims for money damages relating to nursing home patients' deaths following massi

ended Complaint must be dismissed or, alternatively, a more definite statement must be provided consistent with the law set out above. e. Plaintiff Lacks Standing To Bring The Claims Asserted In Count IV As To Predicate Acts 46(a)-(g) Because Plaintiff Has Not Alleged A Direct Injury As A Result Of The Predicate Acts