Epstein Secrets

ion that civil and criminal cases proceed together." United States ex reL Gonzalez v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 761 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted). Epstein has shown no good reason for deviating from normal practice here. One last reason weighing against a

a stay only after that defendant has been indicted." United States ex rel. Gonzalez v. Fresenius Medical Cam North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 763 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ventura v. Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (granting a stay of civil proc

in being required to go forward, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay for which he prays will work damage to someone else." Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 255 (1936). A civil defendant who asserts the Fifth Amendment privilege "may have to accept certain bad consequences that flow from

on that civil and criminal cases proceed together." United States ex rel. Gonzalez v. Fresenlus Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 761 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted). Epstein has shown no good reason for deviating from normal practice here. One last reason weighing against a

stay only after that defendant has been indicted." United States ex rel. Gonzalez v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 763 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ventura v. Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (granting a stay of civil proc

in being required to go forward, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay for which he prays will work damage to someone else." Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S.. 248, 255 (1936). A civil defendant who asserts the Fifth Amendment privilege "may have to accept certain bad consequences that flow from

on that civil and criminal cases proceed together." United States ex rel. Gonzalez I. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 761 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted). Epstein has shown no good reason for deviating from normal practice here. One last reason weighing against a

stay only after that defendant has been indicted." United States ex rel. Gonzalez I. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 763 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ventura Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (granting a stay of civil procee

y in being required to go forward, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay for which he prays will work damage to someone else." Landis'. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 255 (1936). A civil defendant who asserts the Fifth Amendment privilege "may have to accept certain bad consequences that flow from