Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00722611

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

Page 1 LexisNexis' I of 100 DOCUMENTS NEW YORK CONSOLIDATED LAW SERVICE Copyright (c) 2005 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., one of the LEXIS Publishing (TM) companies All rights reserved *** ARCHIVE *** *** THIS SECTION IS CURRENT THROUGH THE 2005 SESSION *** PENAL LAW PART THREE. SPECIFIC OFFEN

ves having party at motel and agreeing to pay defendant $ 450 to dance, to provide another woman, and to have sex with them. People v Rollova (1986, 3d Dept) 124 App Div 2d 886, 508 NYS2d 653. Plaintiffs (prostitute and patron of prostitutes) failed to present justiciable controversy, and accordingly di

EFTA00722615

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ion, pleaded guilty and was sentenced) to determine whether this section was properly applied in his case. People a rel. Calderone v Jackson (1957, 3d Dept) 4 App Div 2d 914, 167 NYS2d 48. Where a defendant had been convicted and sentenced under this section as a first offender, a writ of error or coram

EFTA00722627

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

had one woman working for her, the acceptance of her guilty plea under these circumstances constituted an abuse of discretion. People v Etoll (1977, 3d Dept) 57 App Div 2d 973, 394 NYS2d 112. In a prosecution for promoting prostitution in the third degree, in which defendant contended that there was an