ves having party at motel and agreeing to pay defendant $ 450 to dance, to provide another woman, and to have sex with them. People v Rollova (1986, 3d Dept) 124 App Div 2d 886, 508 NYS2d 653. Plaintiffs (prostitute and patron of prostitutes) failed to present justiciable controversy, and accordingly di

ion, pleaded guilty and was sentenced) to determine whether this section was properly applied in his case. People a rel. Calderone v Jackson (1957, 3d Dept) 4 App Div 2d 914, 167 NYS2d 48. Where a defendant had been convicted and sentenced under this section as a first offender, a writ of error or coram

had one woman working for her, the acceptance of her guilty plea under these circumstances constituted an abuse of discretion. People v Etoll (1977, 3d Dept) 57 App Div 2d 973, 394 NYS2d 112. In a prosecution for promoting prostitution in the third degree, in which defendant contended that there was an