Epstein Secrets

osing less restrictive (but still substantial) reporting obligations on those persons convicted of a qualifying sex offense who pose less danger to the People of the State of New York. SORA is not intended to be punitive, but rather, is a protective mechanism designed to shield the public from sexual offenders by enabling law enf

t. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matter of discretion") (citing People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 568 n.2 (2009); People v. Johnson, 11 N.Y.3d 416, 418, 421 (2008)). As noted above, Jeffrey Epstein presents a negligible risk of r

osing less restrictive (but still substantial) reporting obligations on those persons convicted of a qualifying sex offense who pose less danger to the People of the State of New York. Those offenders deemed most likely to reoffend, as well as "sexually violent offenders," "predicate sex offenders," and "sexual predators," are ge

t. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matter of discretion") (citing People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 568 n.2 (2009); People v. Johnson, 11 N.Y.3d 416, 418, 421 (2008)). As noted above, Jeffrey Epstein presents a negligible risk of r

osing less restrictive (but still substantial) reporting obligations on those persons convicted of a qualifying sex offense who pose less danger to the People of the State of New York. SORA is not intended to be punitive, but rather, is a protective mechanism designed to shield the public from sexual offenders by enabling law enf

t. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matter of discretion") (citing People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 568 n.2 (2009); People v. Johnson, 11 N.Y.3d 416, 418, 421 (2008)). As noted above, Jeffrey- Mr. Epstein presents a negligible risk