enteen years earlier. The defendant sold and delivered a copy of the newspaper to the plaintiff's agent seventeen years after publication, and, as the New York Court of Appeals summarized it, the English court held "each delivery to a third person of a defamatory article constituted a new publication of the libel, which i

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

hat the acts of a corporation's agents are imputed to the corporation - regardless of whether the agents are insiders. The Lehr court observed that the New York Court of Appeals made clear in Kirschner that the doctrine of in pari delicto had only one "narrow" exception to imputation - the adverse interest exception. The Le

urdened with going and sitting for a deposition where her counsel basically objects to every question as privileged under the Shield Law. And both the New York Court of Appeals and the Second Circuit have emphasized that. The New York Court of Appeals said, in Holmes v. Winter, which we cite in our brief, where the entire