Epstein Secrets

ated in any way with M, asserting instead that Epstein merely "had contacts at M." FAC ¶ 60. Such bare allegations are insufficient. Ashland Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 652 F.3d 333, 338 (2d Cir. 2011) (dismissing complaint where plaintiff could not have reasonably relied on defendant); Schlaifer Nance & Co. v. Es

actual basis must be supplied to support the charges. 4 EFTA00307101 Wood v. Research Applied Associates, 328 Fed.Appx. 744, 747 (2d Cir. 2009); O'Brien v. Nat'l Prop. Analysts Partners, 936 F.2d 674, 676 (2d Cir.1991). Plaintiff's allegations of fraud boil down to this: Epstein allegedly "confirmed to Plain

the ability "to have Plaintiff admitted to' For example, the Complaint fails to allege that Epstein was associated in any way wit Ashland Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 652 F.3d 333, 338 (2d Cir. 2011) (dismissing complaint where plaintiff could not have reasonably relied on defendant); Schlaifer Nance & Co. v. Est

ations. An ample factual basis must be supplied to support the charges. Wood v. Research Applied Associates, 328 Fed.Appx. 744, 747 (2d Cir. 2009); O'Brien v. Nat'l Prop. Analysts Partners, 936 F.2d 674, 676 (2d Cir.1991). Plaintiff's allegations of fraud boil down to this: Epstein allegedly "confirmed to Plain

bility "to have Plaintiff admitted to" . For example, the Complaint fails to allege that Epstein was associated in any way with . Ashland Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 652 F.3d 333, 338 (2d Cir. 2011) (dismissing complaint where plaintiff could not have reasonably relied on defendant); Schlaifer Nance & Co. v. Est

ations. An ample factual basis must be supplied to support the charges. Wood v. Research Applied Associates, 328 Fed.Appx. 744, 747 (2d Cir. 2009); O'Brien v. Nat'l Prop. Analysts Partners, 936 F.2d 674, 676 (2d Cir.1991). Plaintiff's allegations of fraud boil down to this: Epstein allegedly "confirmed to Plain