Epstein Secrets

s Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing Names with Initials of Edwards' Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] 15 3/5/18 Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Ma

onal Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Master [Sealed] [D.E. 1252] 4/4/18 Epstein's Supplement and Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability and/or Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product With Regard to Sealed Documents [D.E.

from Trial Docket in Order to Comply With the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440; work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials; work on Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special M

/18 PVD [Ne -ci analysis of production re( 03/16/18 PVD [N locket for chronology of pri .ss. .vork on updating same 03/16/18 KBR le' or In Camera Review of " trict Court of Appeal de :arch re all r. 90.702, work-product pr inethical behavior, is; onse in Opposition to Pr eider from the Fo

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr

d federal case law cited in J. Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Privileged Nature of Documents and with Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability, and Waiver, Plaintiffs Response thereto, and our Supplement thereto on the issues of "issue injection' an