Epstein Secrets

. and as good a theory as any scientist can propose. </=iv> On Mon, Jul 1=, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Rupert sheldrake wrote: Dear Jeffrey, Yes, I think Brian Josephson =s indeed rather scattered. I don't think De=pak is interested in deep theoretical issues so I don't think you'll succeed in moving him toward= the

ace tension can probably expla=n the form quite adequately. Simple physical explanations like surface tension fail when it comes to leaves although D'Arcy Thompson tried to extend them into the biological r=alm. We are off for Canada tomorro= and away for 2 months on a remote island in BC. I hope still to be in

. and as good a theory as any scientist can propose. </=iv> On Mon, Jul 1=, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Rupert Sheldrake wrote: Dear Jeffrey, Yes, I think Brian Josephson =s indeed rather scattered. I don't think De=pak is interested in deep theoretical issues so I don't think you'll succeed in moving him toward= the

ace tension can probably expla=n the form quite adequately. Simple physical explanations like surface tension fail when it comes to leaves although D'Arcy Thompson tried to extend them into the biological r=alm. We are off for Canada tomorro= and away for 2 months on a remote island in BC. I hope still to be in

very very elegant. =nd as good a theory as any scientist can propose. On Mon, Jul 11, =016 at 6:49 AM, Rupert Sheldrake Dear Jeffrey, Yes, = think Brian Josephson is indeed rather scattered. rote: I don't think =eepak is interested in deep theoretical issues so I don't think you'll succeed in moving him towa

sion can probably =xplain the form quite adequately. =/span>Simple physical explanations like surface tension fail when it comes to leaves although D'Arcy Thompson tried to extend them into the biological =ealm. We are off for Canada tomorrow and away for 2 =onths on a remote island in BC. I =ope still to be in