Epstein Secrets

3 (PAE) v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. X REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT David E. McCraw Al-Amyn Sumar Alexandra Settelmayer The New York Times Company Legal Department 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Phone: 212-556-4031 Facs

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

3 (PAE) v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. X REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT David E. McCraw Al-Amyn Sumar Alexandra Settelmayer The New York Times Company Legal Department 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Counsel for Plaintiff EF

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

3 (PAE) v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. X REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT David E. McCraw Al-Amyn Sumar Alexandra Settelmayer The New York Times Company Legal Department 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Counsel for Plaintiff EF

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r