nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

ents. In this capacity, I typically work with staff at BOP's Central Office. In this case, I communicated with BOP Government Information Specialist Kara Christenson regarding Plaintiff's FOIA requests. 3. I submit this declaration in support of the BOP's motion for summary judgment and to 1 EFTA00075372 Cas

ed Records"), including those reflected as withheld in full at Entries 55- 57 and 60 on the updated index attached to the Supplemental Declaration of Kara Christenson (the "updated BOP index"). The 7(A) Returned Records fall into four categories: documents related to counts of inmates, staffing records, psycholog

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

ents. In this capacity, I typically work with staff at BOP's Central Office. In this case, I communicated with BOP Government Information Specialist Kara Christenson regarding Plaintiff's FOIA requests. 3. I submit this declaration in support of the BOP's motion for summary judgment and to 1 EFTA00088661 Cas

ed Records"), including those reflected as withheld in full at Entries 55- 57 and 60 on the updated index attached to the Supplemental Declaration of Kara Christenson (the "updated BOP index"). The 7(A) Returned Records fall into four categories: documents related to counts of inmates, staffing records, psycholog

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r