Epstein Secrets

ent's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enft, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167637, at *33 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2020). "General explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone d

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

ent's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enft, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167637, at *33 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2020). "General explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone d

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

ent's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enft, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167637, at *33 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2020). "General explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone d

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r