Epstein Secrets

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA

purposes. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tarta

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA

purposes. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tarta

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA

enforcement purposes. See Supp. Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The and Supplemental Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tartaglione prose