Epstein Secrets

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA

t as the Government explained, even if this Court 6 EFTA00071593 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 11 of 25 does not follow the Tenth Circuit's per se rule and instead applies a more practical approach, the documents at issue were still compiled for law enforcement purposes. See BOP MOL at 8

26 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CI

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

26 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CI

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA

t as the Government explained, even if this Court 6 EFTA00088614 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 11 of 25 does not follow the Tenth Circuit's per se rule and instead applies a more practical approach, the documents at issue were still compiled for law enforcement purposes. See BOP MOL at 8

26 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20 Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of, Del, 901 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2018) 5 Amnesty Intl USA v. CI

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

017) 19 Albuquerque Pub. Co. v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 726 F. Supp. 851 (D.D.C. 1989) 19 Allard K Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 19, 20 American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 17 Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA

t as the Government explained, even if this Court 6 EFTA00099607 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 11 of 25 does not follow the Tenth Circuit's per se rule and instead applies a more practical approach, the documents at issue were still compiled for law enforcement purposes. See BOP MOL at 8