Epstein Secrets

AF investment $5,100,000 Banco Loan. $15,300,000 Purchase amt. $25,500,000 JE put in about $12,750,000 (half of the "value") and later, when the Banco financing was concluded, he got back about $7,650,000 from the proceeds. The question is, how could the bank support a $15,300,000 loan on a proper

which lists all costs, fees etc. At the end of the day, I think the docs should roughly show: JE investment $5,100,000 AF investment $5,100,000 Banco Loan. $15,300,000 Purchase amt. $25,500,000 JE put in about $12,750,000 (half of the "value") and later, when the Banco financing was concluded, he got

AF investment $5,100,000 Banco Loan. $15,300,000 Purchase amt. $25,500,000 JE put in about $12,750,000 (half of the "value") and later, when the Banco financing was concluded, he got back about $7,650,000 from the proceeds. The question is, how could the bank support a $15,300,000 loan on a proper

which lists all costs, fees etc. At the end of the day, I think the docs should roughly show: JE investment $5,100,000 AF investment $5,100,000 Banco Loan. $15,300,000 Purchase amt. $25,500,000 JE put in about $12,750,000 (half of the "value") and later, when the Banco financing was concluded, he got

$5,100,000 Banco Loan. =15,300,000 =. =nbsp; Purchase amt. =25,500,000 JE put in about $12,750,000 (half of the =quot;value") and later, when the Banco financing was concluded, he =ot back about $7,650,000 from the proceeds. The question is, how could the bank support a =15,300,000 loan on a proper

t which lists =11 costs, fees etc. At the end of the day, I think the dots should roughly =how: JE investment $5,100,000 AF investment $5,100,000 Banco Loan. =15,300,000 =. =nbsp; Purchase amt. =25,500,000 JE put in about $12,750,000 (half of the =quot;value") and later, when the Banco financing was co