Epstein Secrets

s been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on August 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 o fax] By: Is/ Scott J. Link Kara

F HIS SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS, ETC. As supplemental authority in support of his Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non- Privileged Nature of Documents and with Specific Request for In Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability

been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on July 24, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA By: /.s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Trial Counsel for Plaint

s Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing Names with Initials of Edwards' Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] 15 3/5/18 Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Ma

been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBI_ Kara Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser FBN Primary: Primary: P

ndix in Support of Response in Opposition to Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and D.E. 1252, Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for 2 EFTA00793756 Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and

include trial court's multip' .rences to J. Epstein's original proceeding as bei :nesis" for B. Edwards' counterclaim 03/10/18 RJG Revir. s of Judicial Administration re sealing of rector( Jpellate court 03/10/18 RJG Reviev. yze correspondence from non-party intervel. ounsel re failure to caption them In fil

from Trial Docket in Order to Comply With the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440; work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials; work on Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special M