Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e U.S. Virgin Islands. • In 2006, Mr. Epstein settled a Florida Circuit Court case with an artwork consignor. • In 2007, an action commenced in New York Supreme Court by the liquidating trustee of a limited partnership against Mr. Epstein as trustee of one of the limited partners was dismissed with prejudice. •
been subject to an audit or a post audit penalty assessment by a tax authority (including, but not limited to, the Internal Revenue Service and/or the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue). Moreover, neither Mr. Epstein nor any of his controlled affiliates have ever been adjudged, either civilly or criminally, to be in violation of a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or, the dealer and Mr. Epstein over ownership of artwork which Mr. Epstein purchased for good value from the dealer. • An action was commenced in New York Supreme Court by the liquidating trustee of a limited partnership to recover distributions made several years earlier to a limited partner on the basis of audite
been subject to an audit or a post audit penalty assessment by a tax authority (including, but not limited to, the Internal Revenue Service and/or the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue). Moreover, neither Mr. Epstein nor any of his controlled affiliates have ever been adjudged, either civilly or criminally, to be in violation of a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or, the dealer and Mr. Epstein over ownership of artwork which Mr. Epstein purchased for good value from the dealer. • An action was commenced in New York Supreme Court by the liquidating trustee of a limited partnership to recover distributions made several years earlier to a limited partner on the basis of audite
been subject to an audit or a post audit penalty assessment by a tax authority (including, but not limited to, the Internal Revenue Service and/or the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue). Moreover, neither Mr. Epstein nor any of his controlled affiliates have ever been adjudged, either civilly or criminally, to be in violation of a
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e U.S. Virgin Islands. • In 2006, Mr. Epstein settled a Florida Circuit Court case with an artwork consignor. • In 2007, an action commenced in New York Supreme Court by the liquidating trustee of a limited partnership against Mr. Epstein as trustee of one of the limited partners was dismissed with prejudice. •
been subject to an audit or a post audit penalty assessment by a tax authority (including, but not limited to, the Internal Revenue Service and/or the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue). Moreover, neither Mr. Epstein nor any of his controlled affiliates have ever been adjudged, either civilly or criminally, to be in violation of a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or, the dealer and Mr. Epstein over ownership of artwork which Mr. Epstein purchased for good value from the dealer. • An action was commenced in New York Supreme Court by the liquidating trustee of a limited partnership to recover distributions made several years earlier to a limited partner on the basis of audite
been subject to an audit or a post audit penalty assessment by a tax authority (including, but not limited to, the Internal Revenue Service and/or the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue). Moreover, neither Mr. Epstein nor any of his controlled affiliates have ever been adjudged, either civilly or criminally, to be in violation of a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or, the dealer and Mr. Epstein over ownership of artwork which Mr. Epstein purchased for good value from the dealer. • An action was commenced in New York Supreme Court by the liquidating trustee of a limited partnership to recover distributions made several years earlier to a limited partner on the basis of audite
been subject to an audit or a post audit penalty assessment by a tax authority (including, but not limited to, the Internal Revenue Service and/or the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue). Moreover, neither Mr. Epstein nor any of his controlled affiliates have ever been adjudged, either civilly or criminally, to be in violation of a
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (25)
Entities connected to both New York Supreme Court and the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON25 w/ New·7 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION14 w/ New·7 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ New·6 w/ the
Financial Trust Company
ORGANIZATION11 w/ New·6 w/ the
New York
LOCATION13 w/ New·4 w/ the
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON10 w/ New·6 w/ the
United States
LOCATION10 w/ New·5 w/ the
the Florida Circuit Court
ORGANIZATION8 w/ New·6 w/ the
EK
Erika Kellerhals
PERSON8 w/ New·6 w/ the
RTPark
ORGANIZATION8 w/ New·6 w/ the
Federal District Court
ORGANIZATION7 w/ New·6 w/ the
Palm Beach
LOCATION8 w/ New·4 w/ the
Virgin Islands Superior Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ New·6 w/ the
Central America
LOCATION6 w/ New·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION6 w/ New·4 w/ the
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION6 w/ New·4 w/ the
Bear Stearns & Company
ORGANIZATION6 w/ New·4 w/ the
the Virgin Islands Superior Court
LOCATION5 w/ New·4 w/ the
KF
Kellehals Ferguson
PERSON4 w/ New·4 w/ the
Financial Infomatics Virgin Islands
ORGANIZATION4 w/ New·2 w/ the