Epstein Secrets

ral Rico Act is equally applicable to claims under the Florida Rico statute). 2. Moore v. Potter, 142 Fed. Appx. WL 1600194 (11Th Cir. 2005). 3. Pilkington v. United Airlines 112 F.3d 1532, 1536 (11th Cir,1997) 4. Stansfield v. Starkey, 269 Cal.Rptr., 337, 348 (Cal. App.3d, 1990) 5. Zimmerman v. HBO

A 1992). 2. Palmus Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, 881 So.2d 565 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2004). 3. Bivens Gardens Office Bldg., Inc. v. Barnett Banks of Fla., Inc., 140 F.3d 898, 906, 908 (11th Cir. 1998). 4. Baisch v. Gallina, 346 F.3d 366, 373 (2d Cir. 2003). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY

ral Rico Act is equally applicable to claims under the Florida Rico statute). 2. Moore v. Potter, 142 Fed. Appx. WL 1600194 (11Th Cir. 2005). 3. Pilkington v. United Airlines 112 F.3d 1532, 1536 (11th Cir,1997) 4. Stansfield v. Starkey, 269 Cal.Rptr., 337, 348 (Cal. App.3d, 1990) 5. Zimmerman v. HBO

A 1992). 2. Palmus Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, 881 So.2d 565 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2004). 3. Bivens Gardens Office Bldg., Inc. v. Barnett Banks of Fla., Inc., 140 F.3d 898, 906, 908 (1191 Cir. 1998). 4. Baisch v. Gallina, 346 F.3d 366, 373 (2d Cir. 2003). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY

at the racketeering activity caused him to suffer an injary. . ., a claim stemming from personal injury is not cognizable under Rico." Id; see also Pilkington v. United Airlines. 112 F.3d 1532, 1536 (11th Cir. 1997); Federal Procedure, 5B Fed. Proc., L. Ed., §10:160, Sta a, Private Civil Actions Under ER

that the letters/communications proximately caused their damages. Id. at 573-574. The Palmas Court, citing to Bivens Gardens Office Bide., Inc. v. Barnett Banks of Fla., Inc., 140 F.3d 898, 906, 908 (11th Cir. 1998), further reasoned that "a party whose injuries result 'merely from the misfortunes visited u