Epstein Secrets

g party fails to satisfy the court that the evidence would prejudice that party's action or defense on the merits." Developers Stir. & Indem. Co. v. Bi-Tech Const., Inc., 979 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2013); see, e.g., Baker v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 793 F.2d 1196 (11th Cir.1986) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 15

t to add her as a party." DE 290 at 8. This unsupported allegation is simply false. See Aff. of Jane Doe No. 3 at 7, Exhibit 1 to Victims' Reply in Support of Motion for Joinder (hereinafter "Jane Doe No. 3 Aft") (responding to Government's claim of legal representation and attesting "[t]his is completely untrue, and I think

ting party fails to satisfy the court that the evidence would prejudice that party's action or defense on the merits." Developers Sur. & Indem. Co.' Bi-Tech Const., Inc., 979 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2013); see, e.g., Baker. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 793 F.2d 1196 (11th Cir.1986) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(b

t to add her as a party." DE 290 at 8. This unsupported allegation is simply false. See Aff. of Jane Doe No. 3 at 7, Exhibit 1 to Victims' Reply in Support of Motion for Joinder (hereinafter "Jane Doe No. 3 Aft") (responding to Government's claim of legal representation and attesting "[t]his is completely untrue, and I think

ing party fails to satisfy the court that the evidence would prejudice that party's action or defense on the merits." Developers Sur. & lndem. Co.'. Bi-Tech Const., Inc., 979 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2013); see, e.g., Baker. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 793 F.2d 1196 (11th Cir.1986) (Fed.R.Civ.P. I5(b

t to add her as a party." DE 290 at 8. This unsupported allegation is simply false. See Aff. of Jane Doe No. 3 at 7, Exhibit I to Victims' Reply in Support of Motion for Joinder (hereinafter "Jane Doe No. 3 Aff.") (responding to Government's claim of legal representation and attesting "[t]his is completely untrue, and I thin