Epstein Secrets

fectuate the general purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits and to dispense with technical procedural problems." Staren I Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 (7th Cir. 1976). Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically allows an amendment, providing

irms that relation back also "extends by analogy to amendments changing plaintiffs." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, Adv. Comm. Notes, 1966 Amend. According to the Advisory Committee, the new version of Rule 15(c) did not include express language about adding plaintiffs because that "problem is generally easier" than adding defe

effectuate the general purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits and to dispense with technical procedural problems." Stares v. Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 (7th Cir. 1976). Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically allows an amendment, providing

irms that relation back also "extends by analogy to amendments changing plaintiffs." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, Adv. Comm. Notes, 1966 Amend. According to the Advisory Committee, the new version of Rule 15(c) did not include express language about adding plaintiffs because that "problem is generally easier" than adding defe

effectuate the general purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits and to dispense with technical procedural problems." Staren v. Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 (7th Cir. 1976). Rule 15(aX2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically allows an amendment, providing t

irms that relation back also "extends by analogy to amendments changing plaintiffs." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, Adv. Comm. Notes, 1966 Amend. According to the Advisory Committee, the new version of Rule 15(c) did not include express language about adding plaintiffs because that "problem is generally easier" than adding defe

ase 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 20 of 21 facts and issues on which the action is based." Slarenl. Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. qf Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 (7th Cir. 1976). The Court should accordingly allow an amended pleading. CONCLUSION Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe No

irms that relation back also "extends by analogy to amendments changing plaintiffs." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, Adv. Comm. Notes, 1966 Amend. According to the Advisory Committee, the new version of Rule I5(c) did not include express language about adding plaintiffs because that "problem is generally easier" than adding defe