Epstein Secrets

fectuate the general purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits and to dispense with technical procedural problems." Staren I Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 (7th Cir. 1976). Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically allows an amendment, providing

frequently allowed plaintiffs to amend their pleading to add new plaintiffs. See, e.g., Joshlin I Gannett River States Pub. Corp., 152 F.R.D. 577 (E.D. Ark. 1993) (amendment to name all purported class members as plaintiffs); Otto'. Milwaukee Cnty., No. 07-C-427, 2007 WL 3228118, at *2 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 30, 20

effectuate the general purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits and to dispense with technical procedural problems." Stares v. Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 (7th Cir. 1976). Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically allows an amendment, providing

frequently allowed plaintiffs to amend their pleading to add new plaintiffs. See, e.g., Joshlin v. Gannett River States Pub. Corp., 152 F.R.D. 577 (E.D. Ark. 1993) (amendment to name all purported class members as plaintiffs); Otto v. Milwaukee Ouy., No. 07-C-427, 2007 WL 3228118, at *2 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 30, 20

effectuate the general purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits and to dispense with technical procedural problems." Staren v. Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 (7th Cir. 1976). Rule 15(aX2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically allows an amendment, providing t

frequently allowed plaintiffs to amend their pleading to add new plaintiffs. See, e.g., Joshlin v. Gannett River States Pub. Corp., 152 F.R.D. 577 (E.D. Ark. 1993) (amendment to name all purported class members as plaintiffs); Otto v. Milwaukee Cnty., No. 07-C-427, 2007 WL 3228118, at *2 (ED. Wis. Oct. 30, 20

ase 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 20 of 21 facts and issues on which the action is based." Slarenl. Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. qf Chicago, 529 F.2d 1257, 1263 (7th Cir. 1976). The Court should accordingly allow an amended pleading. CONCLUSION Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe No

ve frequently allowed plaintiffs to amend their pleading to add new plaintiffs. See. e.g.. Joshlin Gannett River States Pub. Corp., 152 F.R.D. 577 (E.D. Ark. 1993) (amendment to name all purported class members as plaintiffs); Otto'. Milwaukee C'nty., No. 07-C-427, 2007 WL 3228118, at '2 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 30, 2