4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Comoration et al., 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (CA.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but that decision remains within the sound discretion of the court. I
. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996Xconsolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share all
Corporation et al. 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but that decision remains within the sound discretion of the court. I
. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share al
Corporation et al. 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but that decision remains within the sound discretion of the court. I
. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share al
rporation et al., 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but that decision remains within the sound discretion of the court. I
. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share al
Entities connected to both Florida Rules of Civil and Kelly v. Kelly

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONFord Motor Credit Company
ORGANIZATIONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONMichael J. Pike
PERSONLeve v. General Motors Corp.
ORGANIZATIONF.R.D. 508
ORGANIZATIONN.D. NY
ORGANIZATIONLuttier & Coleman
ORGANIZATIONOlyphant v. PPL Corporation et al. 153
ORGANIZATIONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSOND. Critton
PERSON