Epstein Secrets

ld a stay not be 769 So.2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Defendants fail to adequately ad completely ignores the likelihood likelihood that the Fourth District would reverse for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defe

T IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN AD DIEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and coun

ately ad s these fa rs in their motion. In fact, Defendant completely ignores the likelihood Likely this is because there is no likelihood that the Fourth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to

IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife"), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and cou

equately ad•` s fa ;•rs in their motion. In fact, Defendant completely ignores the likelihood Likely this is because there is no likelihood that the Fourth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to

MENT IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN .LITEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN. LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife"), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and cou