Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
probative value. These arguments rely heavily on a district court opinion from outside this circuit, United States v. Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D. Me. 2010). After careful consideration of the Defense's arguments and the thorough reasoning in Raymond, the Court concludes that Dr. Rocchio's antici
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubers need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
probative value. These arguments rely heavily on a district court opinion from outside this circuit, United States v. Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D. Me. 2010). After careful consideration of the Defense's arguments and the thorough reasoning in Raymond, the Court concludes that Dr. Rocchio's antici
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubers need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
probative value. These arguments rely heavily on a district court opinion from outside this circuit, United States v. Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D. Me. 2010). After careful consideration of the Defense's arguments and the thorough reasoning in Raymond, the Court concludes that Dr. Rocchio's antici
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubers need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (41)
Entities connected to both D. Me and E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ D.·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON6 w/ D.·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
United States
LOCATION7 w/ D.·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ D.·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Russell Simmons
PERSON5 w/ D.·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
DA
Daubert
PERSON5 w/ D.·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
LR
Lisa Rocchio
PERSON3 w/ D.·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION3 w/ D.·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON4 w/ D.·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION3 w/ D.·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
USDC SONY
ORGANIZATION3 w/ D.·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
Alto v. Sun Pharm
ORGANIZATION3 w/ D.·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
Raymond
PERSON5 w/ D.·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON4 w/ D.·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
RA
Randall
PERSON4 w/ D.·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION4 w/ D.·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
Torres
PERSON4 w/ D.·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
Federal Rule of Evidence 702
ORGANIZATION4 w/ D.·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON4 w/ D.·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
TE
Telles
PERSON4 w/ D.·3 w/ E.E.O.C.