Epstein Secrets

To be Argued By: JAY P. LEFKOWITZ New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 .ettr 'lark $upreme Court APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). Accordingly, the Order 6 By previewing for the Appellate Court "[t]he People's evidence on remand," see Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7, the People have improperly introduced materials dehors the record. See Mount Lucas

in response. I look forward to hearing your opinion. Yours truly, ti 6t 1 of Lc.) Deborah L. Morse Assistant District Attorney EFTA00231442 New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 'sin 'Dark $ig:matte &curt APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, —against— JEFFR

er of simply filing a writ of petition and that stays the release of the order. There would have to be a separate motion that would be filed with the Appellate Court. The Motion to Stay that we file under 9.310, subsection A, it party that seeks review Appellate Rule provides that the shall come to the lowe

peal, as well as a copy of our brief in response. I look forward to hearing your opinion. Yours truly, Deborah L. Morse Attorney EFTA00232562 New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 'et' Vark tyrant arrurt APPELLATE DIVISION—FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

er of simply filing a writ of petition and that stays the release of the order. There would have to be a separate motion that would be filed with the Appellate Court. The Motion to Stay that we file under 9.310, subsection A, it party that seeks review Appellate Rule provides that the shall come to the lowe