Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
endant's lack of tics to the United States and his extensive tics to Brazil with which no extradition treaty exists. In our view, his forfeiture of Slmillion worth of assets in the United States would not deter him from flight when in Brazil he has significant wealth, a lucrative job, the presence of his
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
endant's lack of tics to the United States and his extensive tics to Brazil with which no extradition treaty exists. In our view, his forfeiture of Slmillion worth of assets in the United States would not deter him from flight when in Brazil he has significant wealth, a lucrative job, the presence of his
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
endant's lack of tics to the United States and his extensive tics to Brazil with which no extradition treaty exists. In our view, his forfeiture of Slmillion worth of assets in the United States would not deter him from flight when in Brazil he has significant wealth, a lucrative job, the presence of his
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
endant's lack of tics to the United States and his extensive tics to Brazil with which no extradition treaty exists. In our view, his forfeiture of Slmillion worth of assets in the United States would not deter him from flight when in Brazil he has significant wealth, a lucrative job, the presence of his
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both Shakur and Slmillion
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
LA
LaFontaine
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Michael Jackson
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
United Kingdom
LOCATION5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Dominguez
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
James Baker
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Oliver Stone
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Mukasey
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Singh
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Contreras
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
New Mexico
LOCATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
GO
Goodwin
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
the New York State Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Larry Celona
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
Community
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion
International Affairs
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Slmillion