Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both Shakur and Interstate Facilities
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
United Kingdom
LOCATION5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Michael Jackson
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Dominguez
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
LA
LaFontaine
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Oliver Stone
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Mukasey
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Singh
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Contreras
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
New Mexico
LOCATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
GO
Goodwin
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
the New York State Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Larry Celona
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
Community
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
International Affairs
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate
New York
LOCATION4 w/ Shakur·4 w/ Interstate