Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
trict courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization of a minor is unusual in that it includes a presumption in favor o
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
trict courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization of a minor is unusual in that it includes a presumption in favor o
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
trict courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization of a minor is unusual in that it includes a presumption in favor o
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
trict courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization of a minor is unusual in that it includes a presumption in favor o
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (89)
Entities connected to both Shakur and E. The Presumption of Remand
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Dominguez
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
United Kingdom
LOCATION5 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Michael Jackson
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
LA
LaFontaine
PERSON5 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Oliver Stone
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Singh
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Contreras
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Larry Celona
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
New York City
LOCATION4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Palm Beach
LOCATION4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
Mark Epstein
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
James Baker
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.
GO
Goodwin
PERSON4 w/ Shakur·6 w/ E.