Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization
s within the `special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600, 610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)). "The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consid
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (90)
Entities connected to both Bartok and Shakur
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON19 w/ Bartok·7 w/ Shakur
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Bartok·7 w/ Shakur
Oliver Stone
PERSON8 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Bartok·6 w/ Shakur
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ Shakur
New York City
LOCATION7 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
Michael Jackson
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ Shakur
Julie K. Brown
PERSON7 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
United Kingdom
LOCATION6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ Shakur
LA
LaFontaine
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ Shakur
George Mitchell
PERSON7 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
Dominguez
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ Shakur
ST
SORA Hearing Transcript
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
Bradley Edwards
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
Palm Beach
LOCATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
Mark Epstein
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
James Baker
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
Singh
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur
Contreras
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ Shakur