Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
o. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No. 51; United States v. Guerrier, 18 Cr. 284 (JSR), Dkt
l is reduced to the subset of qualified jurors contained in the Qualified Wheel. Because the "systematic defect" alleged by the defendant relates to the Master Jury Wheel, the White Plains Master Jury Wheel is the appropriate "relevant jury pool." Rioux, 930 F. Supp. at 1566-68. Although the Master Jury Wheel does no
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
o. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No. 51; United States v. Guerrier, 18 Cr. 284 (JSR), Dkt
l is reduced to the subset of qualified jurors contained in the Qualified Wheel. Because the "systematic defect" alleged by the defendant relates to the Master Jury Wheel, the White Plains Master Jury Wheel is the appropriate "relevant jury pool." Rioux, 930 F. Supp. at 1566-68. Although the Master Jury Wheel does no
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
o. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et al., 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No. 51; United States v. Guerrier, 18 Cr. 284 (JSR), Dk
l is reduced to the subset of qualified jurors contained in the Qualified Wheel. Because the "systematic defect" alleged by the defendant relates to the Master Jury Wheel, the White Plains Master Jury Wheel is the appropriate "relevant jury pool." Rioux, 930 F. Supp. at 1566-68. Although the Master Jury Wheel does no
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
. 25; United States v. Crornitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No. 51; United States v. Guerrier, 18 Cr. 284 (JSR), Dkt
l is reduced to the subset of qualified jurors contained in the Qualified Wheel. Because the "systematic defect" alleged by the defendant relates to the Master Jury Wheel, the White Plains Master Jury Wheel is the appropriate "relevant jury pool." Rioux, 930 F. Supp. at 1566-68. Although the Master Jury Wheel does no
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (119)
Entities connected to both Arici and the Master Jury Wheel
MA
Mahabub
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
BL
Blaszczak
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
TR
Tracy
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
JI
Jimenez
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
TH
Thompson
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
MA
Mandell
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
Howell
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
CF
Campo Flores
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
TR
Trippe
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
Bronx
LOCATION5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
BS
Bernard R. Siskin
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
BS
Berghuis v. Smith
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
BA
Bahna
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
BE
Bellomo
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
BI
Biaggi
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
BO
Bonventre
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
NS
NORMAN SEABROOK
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON5 w/ Arici·5 w/ the