Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Fourth Amendment and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON6 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Estrada
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
AL
Alfonso
PERSON6 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Resendiz-Ponce
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION6 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON6 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Bill Richardson
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
BH
Branzburg v. Hayes
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Players Computer, Inc.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
DB
Doug Band
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Chris Tucker
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
United Kingdom
LOCATION5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Murray
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
Rutkoske
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.
JO
Joinder
PERSON5 w/ Fourth·4 w/ N.Y.