Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tain a Franks hearing, a defendant must make a "substantial preliminary showing," United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110, 125 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978)), that (i) there were "inaccuracies or omissions" in the affidavit, (ii) "the alleged falsehoods or omissions were nece
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tain a Franks hearing, a defendant must make a "substantial preliminary showing," United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110, 125 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978)), that (i) there were "inaccuracies or omissions" in the affidavit, (ii) "the alleged falsehoods or omissions were nece
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tain a Franks hearing, a defendant must make a "substantial preliminary showing," United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110, 125 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978)), that (i) there were "inaccuracies or omissions" in the affidavit, (ii) "the alleged falsehoods or omissions were nece
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tain a Franks hearing, a defendant must make a "substantial preliminary showing," United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110, 125 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978)), that (i) there were "inaccuracies or omissions" in the affidavit, (ii) "the alleged falsehoods or omissions were nece
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Franks v. Delaware and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON13 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION13 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION13 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON12 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON11 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
David Boies
PERSON11 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON11 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Eric Schmidt
PERSON10 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Valentine
PERSON10 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
MA
Martindell
PERSON10 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Chris Tucker
PERSON10 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON10 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON11 w/ Franks·3 w/ N.Y.
RO
Rochin
PERSON9 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
North Carolina
LOCATION9 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
The New York Daily News Article
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
MY
Myers
PERSON9 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.
Butler
PERSON9 w/ Franks·4 w/ N.Y.