Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell where Government obtained an in
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell where Government obtained an in
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell where Government obtained an in
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell where Government obtained an in
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Herring v. United States and Productions, Inc.
the Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
BO
Botha
PERSON4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
MA
Martindell
PERSON4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
David Boies
PERSON4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
Statistical Tabulating Corp.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
Julie K. Brown
PERSON4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
United States
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·12 w/ Productions,
SW
Sweet
PERSON4 w/ Herring·11 w/ Productions,
Andover Data Servs
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Herring·11 w/ Productions,
Rivera
PERSON4 w/ Herring·10 w/ Productions,
Adriana Ross
PERSON4 w/ Herring·10 w/ Productions,
Bradley Edwards
PERSON4 w/ Herring·10 w/ Productions,
Bill Richardson
PERSON4 w/ Herring·10 w/ Productions,
Michael Jackson
PERSON4 w/ Herring·10 w/ Productions,
Chris Tucker
PERSON4 w/ Herring·10 w/ Productions,