Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
`omit[s] facts which, in retrospect, seem significant.'" United States v. Lahey, 967 F. Supp. 2d 698, 708 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041, at *27 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007)); see also United States v. DeFilippo, No. 17 Cr. 585 (WHP), 2018 WL 740727,
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
`omit[s] facts which, in retrospect, seem significant.'" United States v. Lahey, 967 F. Supp. 2d 698, 708 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041, at *27 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007)); see also United States v. DeFilippo, No. 17 Cr. 585 (WHP), 2018 WL 740727,
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
`omit[s] facts which, in retrospect, seem significant.'" United States v. Lahey, 967 F. Supp. 2d 698, 708 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041, at *27 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007)); see also United States v. DeFilippo, No. 17 Cr. 585 (WHP), 2018 WL 740727,
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
`omit[s] facts which, in retrospect, seem significant.'" United States v. Lahey, 967 F. Supp. 2d 698, 708 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041, at *27 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007)); see also United States v. DeFilippo, No. 17 Cr. 585 (WHP), 2018 WL 740727,
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Vilar and Herring v. United States
United States
LOCATION12 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON12 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
AM
Amato
PERSON12 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
FI
Fisher
PERSON12 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON12 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
North Carolina
LOCATION11 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Chris Tucker
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Rivera
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Adriana Ross
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Bradley Edwards
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
Michael Jackson
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Vilar·3 w/ Herring
Kendall Coffey
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring
David Boies
PERSON10 w/ Vilar·4 w/ Herring