Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt to the charge, then regardless of how prejudicial the language is, it may not be stricken."' Id. (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. DePalma, 461 F. Supp. 778, 797 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 99 (2d Cir. 2001). "This standard is an exacting one, and o
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt to the charge, then regardless of how prejudicial the language is, it may not be stricken."' Id. (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. DePalma, 461 F. Supp. 778, 797 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 99 (2d Cir. 2001). "This standard is an exacting one, and o
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt to the charge, then regardless of how prejudicial the language is, it may not be stricken."' Id. (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. DePalma, 461 F. Supp. 778, 797 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 99 (2d Cir. 2001). "This standard is an exacting one, and o
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ant to the charge, then regardless of how prejudicial the language is, it may not be stricken." Id. (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. DePalma, 461 F. Supp. 778, 797 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 99 (2d Cir. 2001). "This standard is an exacting one, and o
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both DePalma and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Bradley Edwards
PERSON13 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON13 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON12 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Medina
PERSON11 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
New Haven
LOCATION10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Hayes
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Minnesota
LOCATION10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Rivera
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Adriana Ross
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Chris Tucker
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.
Kendall Coffey
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ N.Y.