Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt to the charge, then regardless of how prejudicial the language is, it may not be stricken."' Id. (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. DePalma, 461 F. Supp. 778, 797 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 99 (2d Cir. 2001). "This standard is an exacting one, and o
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature ofcell phone location records," which
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt to the charge, then regardless of how prejudicial the language is, it may not be stricken."' Id. (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. DePalma, 461 F. Supp. 778, 797 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 99 (2d Cir. 2001). "This standard is an exacting one, and o
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt to the charge, then regardless of how prejudicial the language is, it may not be stricken."' Id. (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. DePalma, 461 F. Supp. 778, 797 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 99 (2d Cir. 2001). "This standard is an exacting one, and o
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ant to the charge, then regardless of how prejudicial the language is, it may not be stricken." Id. (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. DePalma, 461 F. Supp. 778, 797 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)); see also United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91, 99 (2d Cir. 2001). "This standard is an exacting one, and o
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both DePalma and the Carpenter Court
Bradley Edwards
PERSON13 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON13 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON12 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Medina
PERSON11 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
New Haven
LOCATION10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Hayes
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Minnesota
LOCATION10 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Rivera
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Adriana Ross
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Chris Tucker
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the
Kendall Coffey
PERSON9 w/ DePalma·4 w/ the